Skip to main content

Tiffany Aching wants to be a witch


I first read The Wee Free Men by Terry Pratchett when I was eleven because the librarian on duty in the teen room at CPL recommended it. The novel is set on the Discworld, which flies through space on the back of four giant elephants who in turn stand on the back of the great turtle A’Tuin. Near the center of the Discworld is the Chalk, an area loosely based on a rural part of England (Wiltshire if you’re interested, which is southwest of Oxford).

Tiffany Aching lives on the Chalk. She is nine years old. She has six older sisters and a two-year-old brother named Wentworth, who she often gets stuck babysitting. Her family are farmers and raise sheep and have farmed and raised sheep for as long as anyone can remember.

Tiffany has other plans: “she’d decided only last week that she wanted to be a witch when she grew up.” Funnily enough, it’s exactly at that moment that Tiffany has her first interaction with magic – a monster jumps out of a stream and tries to steal her younger brother.

Tiffany starts investigating the monster and finds out that there’s a parasitic world led by a fairy queen that’s latched onto the Discworld, is letting monsters in, and of course threatens to destroy everything. She also learns that the Chalk is also inhabited by the Wee Free Men, fairies with a mostly Scottish culture who believe they’re in the afterlife and mainly try to spend as much time as possible drinking, fighting, and stealing before they have to be reincarnated. These pictsies (get it? They’re Scottish) and a toad who used be a lawyer until he brought a suit against a fairy godmother become Tiffany’s allies.

When Tiffany’s brother Wentworth is kidnapped by the fairy queen, Tiffany finds the entrance to the parasitic fairyland and invades it with the pictsies and the toad. She faces down creatures called dromes that trap people in worlds made out of their dreams (the real kind of dreams not the nice kind) only to have to face the Queen in the real world. But Tiffany uses the power of the fossils in the chalk and a storm with the power of her grandmother’s sheepdogs to force the queen back into her own world and rescue her brother.

One reason that I keep rereading The Wee Free Men is that it’s hilarious, but I wouldn’t love it so much if Tiffany weren’t an untraditionally determined hero. Tiffany’s special power isn’t magic, which is considered fairly easy on Discworld, but “first sight and second thoughts,” or the abilities to see what’s really happening in a situation and to think critically, especially about first impressions. These gifts enable Tiffany to have a strong and nuanced sense of right and wrong (especially for a nine-year-old) and she is determined to do right. As an example, Tiffany decides to become a witch in the first place because after a baron’s son went missing, people blamed an old woman who lived by herself, called her a witch, burned her house down, and let her freeze to death in the winter. Tiffany wants to challenge her neighbors’ prejudice and ideas of fairytale evil. Tiffany never refuses the call to action because she thinks someone has to take responsibility for fixing things.

I think a lot of heroic journeys written for teenage audiences, especially books about teenage girls, focus on how a hero dropped into a dramatic problem develops confidence and realizes their own power. And while Tiffany does quiet some of her worries and gain confidence in her magical power over the course of the novel, she never doubts her core beliefs or ability to make good decisions. And though she’s dropped in the middle of a dramatic, world-threatening event, Tiffany assertively chooses to be the witch who saves the day at every step of her journey. For eleven-year-old me, Tiffany, the hero following her own agenda, was a model for self-agency in a chaotic world, which is what I needed as I tried to develop and assert my own personality in the lovely environment of middle school.




On a side note, I have a beautifully illustrated edition of The Wee Free Men and I couldn’t justify writing about the book without sharing some pictures so enjoy these low-quality ones.

Throughout the novel there are tiny pictures of the pictsies messing with the words of the text because that’s just what they do:

 
Here’s Tiffany in the dairy (her job on the farm is making cheese) with the pictsies hiding from her:


And here are some of the nightmares/monsters Tiffany encounters:






 

Comments

  1. Weeping a bit right now. I wrote about Tiffany Aching too, and it's interesting to me the different points we emphasized about her as kids. I love how you point out first sight and second thoughts, as well as her responsibility. She gets stuff done, and it's awesome. I looked a little bit more into how she actually goes about doing things, and how she is very self-sufficient.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I discovered Terry Pratchett's writing several years ago and enjoyed it immensely, especially Tiffany Aching's sub-series. What really struck me was how Tiffany's power isn't something fantastical (like, say, the wizards at the Unseen University with fireballs and seven-league boots and an orangutan in the Library), but rather something solid and reliable, grounded in Tiffany's upbringing/culture of the Chalk (especially her grandmother). In comparison, Tiffany's (supernatural) antagonists tend to be things like the faery court, the Wintersmith, or the Hiver -- all of whom are somehow unreal or that don't fit properly into the world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've read the Tiffany Aching series as well and I loved them. Something that always struck me was how different witches were portrayed in the books compared to most other books. But I think one of the parts of the book that I remember most was the idea that you coulfn't grow a witch on chalk, and yet there Tiffany was.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How does Odysseus feel about his men? Bonus: a lot of questions about class

We’ve discussed a lot to what extent we think Odysseus is a reliable narrator. The main piece of evidence for his reliability is that he includes details about the way he treated his crew that reflect badly on him. Today in class I suggested that he could include these details to make lies seem more realistic and someone suggested that Odysseus probably just truly feels bad about his men’s deaths. But that started me thinking about the weird dynamic of Odysseus’s relationship with his crew so I looked back in the book to see how he talks about his men and their deaths. I presented on book eleven, so I immediately thought of Elpenor. Elpenor certainly seems important to Odysseus since Odysseus mentions him three times: when he first died, when he’s in the underworld, and when he’s actually buried. Odysseus’s attention to Elpenor both in burying him with all the proper rituals and in describing his death in detail in his story shows that Odysseus has some level of affection for him...

Dialogue

The dialogue in Libra is pretty distinctive. It is often short snippets between two characters going back and forth for a while without a lot of dialogue tags. The real meaning of what the characters are saying is hardly ever on the surface. Take Wayne and Raymo in the car on the way to Dallas as an example: “I’m still absorbing this thing,” Wayne said, looking across at Raymo. “You read science fiction?” “Fucking crazy, Wayne?” “There’s a quality I used to feel before a night jump. Like is this actually happening?” “We’re talking this is real.” “I know it’s real.” “First they cancel Chicago right out. Then they do Miami without the motorcade. They know it’s real.” Wayne kept studying Raymo, occasionally darting a look at the road. The car was tight and quiet, beautifully behaved. “Like we’re racing across the night,” he said, mock-hysterical. “They’re paying some nice money. Think of you’re doing a day’s work.” “Like we’re hand-picked men on the biggest miss...

Mary

One thing that confused me in Invisible Man was why the narrator wants to return to Mary at the end of Chapter 25. As he flees from the riot he “ran expecting death between the shoulder blades or through the back of [his] head, and as [he] ran [he] was trying to get to Mary’s” (560). He continues to think of Mary’s as his destination until at the end of the chapter he realizes that “I couldn’t return to Mary’s or to any part of my old life” (571). The narrator is never specific about the logistics of returning to Mary. On the one hand, he’s running in a panic so that makes some sense. On the other hand, he just dropped out of Mary’s life months ago without saying goodbye or contacting her at all since then. If she saw the narrator again, Mary could very well be angry with him and at the very least she would want some sort of an explanation, which the narrator would struggle to give, given that he tells his story for the first time in the book. So the narrator probably doesn’t...