Skip to main content

Ms. Brenda W Kaufman


Even though Pyscho Loco had been planning it, I was still surprised by Gunnar’s marriage. One of the things that especially confused me was why Gunner’s mom was excited about it and totally on board. I realized that I don’t really understand her relationship with Gunnar that well, so I decided to review what we know so far in this post.

In the first few pages of the novel we learn a lot about Gunner’s mother. She’s raised her kids alone after “a vicious custody battle that left the porcelain shrapnel of supper-dish grenades embedded in my father’s neck” (5-6). She works at a clinic that tests people for STIs for free. She’s mother is “a Brooklyn orphan who had never seen her parent or her birth certificate” (6). She holds the world record for the loudest swallow and she set it on the David Letterman show.

She’s the one who tells Gunner all about his father’s family history, but she doesn’t tell him about the women in his father’s family even though she knows about them. I can understand why Gunner’s mother wants Gunner to know about his family history despite hating Gunner’s father. As Gunnar points out by noting that most of his classmates only know a few generations of their ancestors, one legacy of slavery is that many black Americans don’t know who their ancestors were so Gunnar’s history is special. But I don’t understand why Gunner’s mother doesn’t tell Gunnar about the women’s stories. Maybe she wants to keep them to herself as her own source of pride? What do you guys think?

Gunner’s mother also supports Gunner’s interest in poetry. There’s a sweet scene where Gunnar tells her he wants to be a poet:
            “Where do poems come from?”
            “Why? You a poet too?”
            “Soon as I write a poem I will be.”
            “It’s corny but I think poems are echos of the voices in your head and from your past. Your sisters, your father, your ancestors talking to you and through you. […] Gunnar, what kind of poet do you plan to be?
            “I don’t know, the cool tantric type. Shaolin monk style. Lao Tsu but with rhythm.”
            “You’ll do the Kaufman legacy proud, I’m sure.” (79)
I know poetry has a really different status in this book but coming from a world where a lot of parents wouldn’t be overjoyed if their kid told them they wanted to be a poet, it’s great that Gunner can talk to his mom about his goal and they can chat about the nature of poems. I think when his mom tells Gunnar that he’ll “do the Kaufman legacy proud,” she means that he’ll succeed but since Gunner would probably see continuing in the same vein as the rest of the Kaufman legacy as a failure, I’m not sure how to read that line.

One of the biggest things we know about Gunner’s mother is that she moves her family to Hillside immediately after realizing that her children don’t think they’re like other black people. She obviously cares a lot that her children can understand what it means to be black. But it seems like she might be naïve about what Hillside is like since she forces her kids to go to the park where they get beaten up. After Gunnar’s father catches him stealing the safe, his mom also forces him to “hang out with those nice boys” from El Campsino Real High on the weekends, presumably because she doesn’t want him to hang out with his friends in Hillside.

Gunner and his mother do seem to have some other significant conflicts. When Gunner writes to his mother from camp he tells her “Maybe things will be better when I leave the house. I know I haven’t been the ideal son” (142). There’s also a scene where, honoring Pumpkin with the Gun Totin’ Hooligans after his death, Gunnar wants to talk to his mother but feels like he can’t:
I wanted to explain to her that living out here was like being in a never-ending log rolling contest. You never asked why the log was rolling or who was rolling the log. You just spread your arms and kept your feet moving, doing your best not to fall off. Spent all your time trying to anticipate how fast and in what direction the log would spin next. I wanted to take a seat next to my mother and use this lumberjack metaphor to express how tired I was. I wanted to chew my runny eggs and talk with my mouth full. Tell her how much I missed the calm and equipoise of my old like but how I had grown accustomed to running in place, knowing nothing mattered as long as I kept moving. I wanted to say these things to her, but my breath smelled like wet dog shit with a hint of sulpher. (97)
I think Gunner doesn’t want to upset his mom by telling her about his life or he thinks his mom won’t understand him. I’m not sure.

Gunners mom plays an important but normally peripheral role in most of Gunner’s major life events. Overall, she, like most parents, has conflicts with her kids but mostly just tries to raise her children to be the best people they can be and tries to find a balance between traditional ideas of more material success and her deeply-held values.

I still don’t understand how Gunner’s marriage fits into this though. Gunner’s mom must think Yoshiko will make Gunner happy but marriage at 18 to someone you don’t share any languages with has disadvantages that I would have assumed would discourage a parent’s support. Also, Pyscho Loco planned the marriage and Gunners mom didn’t seem enthused about him after the safe incident. What do you guys think?

Comments

  1. You bring up many interesting points! I was baffled by Gunnar's marriage to Yoshiko. Yes, apparently Psycho Loco had been planning the wedding for months or even years, but I never believed he would go through with it. What is really incredible though, is how the marriage ends up working very well and Yoshiko and Gunnar develop a healthy relationship. I believe that Yoshiko and her daughter may be his primary reason for staying alive. Without them he would follow his own advice and commit suicide.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How does Odysseus feel about his men? Bonus: a lot of questions about class

We’ve discussed a lot to what extent we think Odysseus is a reliable narrator. The main piece of evidence for his reliability is that he includes details about the way he treated his crew that reflect badly on him. Today in class I suggested that he could include these details to make lies seem more realistic and someone suggested that Odysseus probably just truly feels bad about his men’s deaths. But that started me thinking about the weird dynamic of Odysseus’s relationship with his crew so I looked back in the book to see how he talks about his men and their deaths. I presented on book eleven, so I immediately thought of Elpenor. Elpenor certainly seems important to Odysseus since Odysseus mentions him three times: when he first died, when he’s in the underworld, and when he’s actually buried. Odysseus’s attention to Elpenor both in burying him with all the proper rituals and in describing his death in detail in his story shows that Odysseus has some level of affection for him...

Dialogue

The dialogue in Libra is pretty distinctive. It is often short snippets between two characters going back and forth for a while without a lot of dialogue tags. The real meaning of what the characters are saying is hardly ever on the surface. Take Wayne and Raymo in the car on the way to Dallas as an example: “I’m still absorbing this thing,” Wayne said, looking across at Raymo. “You read science fiction?” “Fucking crazy, Wayne?” “There’s a quality I used to feel before a night jump. Like is this actually happening?” “We’re talking this is real.” “I know it’s real.” “First they cancel Chicago right out. Then they do Miami without the motorcade. They know it’s real.” Wayne kept studying Raymo, occasionally darting a look at the road. The car was tight and quiet, beautifully behaved. “Like we’re racing across the night,” he said, mock-hysterical. “They’re paying some nice money. Think of you’re doing a day’s work.” “Like we’re hand-picked men on the biggest miss...

Mary

One thing that confused me in Invisible Man was why the narrator wants to return to Mary at the end of Chapter 25. As he flees from the riot he “ran expecting death between the shoulder blades or through the back of [his] head, and as [he] ran [he] was trying to get to Mary’s” (560). He continues to think of Mary’s as his destination until at the end of the chapter he realizes that “I couldn’t return to Mary’s or to any part of my old life” (571). The narrator is never specific about the logistics of returning to Mary. On the one hand, he’s running in a panic so that makes some sense. On the other hand, he just dropped out of Mary’s life months ago without saying goodbye or contacting her at all since then. If she saw the narrator again, Mary could very well be angry with him and at the very least she would want some sort of an explanation, which the narrator would struggle to give, given that he tells his story for the first time in the book. So the narrator probably doesn’t...